1. Look carefully at Sources 3 - 7 and 9. For each source, write two sentences explaning whether you think it is evidence that:
- Supports the view of Goebbels
- Supports the view of Craig
- Could be used to support either interpretation
Source 3: Source 3 supports the viewpoint of historian Gordon Craig. He believed that many supported Hitler because of "negative cohesion, e.g. they shared Nazi fears and dislikes. When Communist support rose as unemployment rose, the Nazis were able to turn this to their advantage by leveraging the fear of the growing communist threat.
Source 4: Source 4 supports the view of Nazi Joseph Goebbels who believed that people supported Hitler for positive reasons. In this source, Hitler's future "architect" Albert Speer mentions how impressed his mother was when she saw a SA troop parade the streets of Heidelberg. The German people, such as Speer's mother, were impressed by the Nazis' discipline in a time of a chaos and their impression of energy in an atmosphere of universal hopelessness.
Source 5: Source 5 supports the viewpoint of Gordon Craig. The poster proclaims "Against Versailles," and the German people despised the Weimar government partly because of the Treaty of Versailles. They voted for the Nazis because they believed that the Nazis could help destroy the Treaty.
Source 6: Source 6 supports the view of Goebbels. Goebbels created his own version of the 1929 - 1933 events and effectively used propaganda to gain support for this version of events. The rallies impressed people with their energy, enthusiasm, sheer size, and Hitler's powerful oratory skills.
Source 7: Source 7 supports the views of Craig. In this source, the Nazis are relying on the German peoples' fear of Communism and their knowledge of frequent street battles between Communists and the police in order to gain votes. Further, farmers, who had read about Soviet government in the USSR taking over the land and killing peasants, were alarmed by the communists.
Source 9: Source 9, a Nazi election poster, supports both the viewpoints of Goebbels and Craig. The Nazis use propaganda to promise to provide the positive benefits of work, freedom, and bread. The source also encourages Germans not to vote for opposing parties and accuse the opposing parties of planning to use terror, corruption, lies, and other strategies as the basis for their government.
2. Now work through the text and other sources on pages 191-94. Make a list of examples and evidence that seem to support either viewpoint.
Support for Goebbels's Viewpoint
- Weimar government indecisive - Germany needs a stronger leader
- Reparations adding to Germany's problems - Kick out the Treaty of Versailles
- Unemployment a problem - Let unemployed join the army, build Germany's armaments & be used for public works
- Effective Nazi campaigning methods - Relied on general slogans rather than detailed policies, wanted to unite the people of Germany behind one leader, posters & pamphlets found everywhere
Support for Craig's Viewpoint
- Shared dislike of democracy in Weimar Germany rather than support for Nazis
- Shared 'Fear of Communism' (crisis deepened - more Communist support) rather than support for Nazis
- Shared Decadence (feeling that traditional German values were under threat) rather than support for Nazis
3. Decide how far you agree with each of the following three statements and give them a score on a scale of 1-5. And then, write a short paragraph explaining your score for each statement.
- Very few people fully supported the Nazis (Score = 5) Explanation: I agree that very few people fully supported the Nazi ideals but instead supported the Nazis because they shared Nazi fears and dislikes. Many Germans shared a dislike of democracy in Weimar Germany with the Nazis. People were frustrated that the Weimar politicians were unable to solve the problems of the Depression. Many Germans also shared a 'fear of communism.' Middle-class business owners were afraid that the German Communists were like the Communists in the USSR and would discriminate against people like them. The owners of big industries feared the Communists because of their plans to introduce state control of business, and the industrialists were also concerned about the growing strength of Germany's trade unions. Germans who felt traditional German values were under threat supported the Nazis because the group talked about restoring these old -fashioned values.
- The key factor was the economic depression. Without it, the Nazis would have remained a minority fringe party. (Score = 3) Explanation: The Nazis' Twenty-Five Points were very attractive to those most vulnerable to the Depression: the unemployed, the elderly and the middle classes. Hitler offered them culprits to blame for Germany's troubles - the Allies, the 'November Criminals,' and the Jews. The Nazis repeated at every opportunity that they believed Jews, Communists, Weimar politicians, and the Treaty of Versailles were the causes of Germany's problems. While the economic depression was a key factor, there were other more important factors, such as the failure of the Weimar Republic.
- The politicians of the Weimar Republic were mainly responsible for the rise of the Nazis (Score = 4) Explanation: The politicians of the Weimar Republic were mainly responsible for the rise of the Nazis. These Weimar politicians seemed unable to tackle the problems of the Depression. When the Depression began to bite in 1930, Chancellor Heinrich Bruning pursued a tough economic policy. He cut government spending and welfare benefits. When Chancellor Heinrich Bruning and President Hindenburg chose to call new elections in 1930, they gave Nazis the opportunity to exploit the fear and discontent in Germany. As a result, the Nazis gained many more votes. As a results, the biggest negative factor resulting in support for the Nazis was a shared dislike of democracy in Weimar Germany. While the Weimar Republic was mainly responsible, there were some other factors, such as the economic situation itself, Nazi propaganda, and Hitler's political skills.